ProofreadingEditingRewritingGhostwritingOutsourced WritingResume WritingGrant Writing TrainingRFP ConsultationTraining

Persuasive Writing: when “more” is “less”

Most of the time, persuasive writing is used in competitive situations.

It is the resume, when you compete with others to get the job. It is the grant proposal, when you compete with others to get funding. It is any time you compete with peers to get donors, votes and even “your way.”

More is less in persuasive writing when you use words that say the same thing. For example, “Our approach is economical, efficient and frugal, freeing up manpower, materials and money for other uses.”

It is obvious to the reader that your plan will save money. In fact, it is obvious over and over and over. The reader tunes out when statements include unnecessary words; and worn out by the repetition, gives little attention to the rest of your statements.

Imagine the sentence above being followed by “Think what we could do with the resources this method saves our organization.” When your sentences repeat the message, you suggest to the reader that you (in a resume) or your plan has no other good qualities; that much of the document is really filler.

In conclusion, when you write  a resume, proposal or sales document, don’t use unnecessary adjectives and redundant sentences. Let each unique point you make stand out.

12 sources to find corporate and foundation grant opportunities

We have done the work for you to find websites that provide sources for corporate and foundation grants. One of the best websites listing resources on a variety of grants — government and private — is posted on About.com.

This Grantsmanship Center website holds the mother lode for a grantwriter. A map with clickable states takes you to lists of the following types of grantmakers in your state: top grantmaking foundations, community foundations, corporate giving programs and the homepage of every state government. The Center has paid subscriptions and other services that can be bought, but the free services are very good as well.

Community Foundations will require a blog post of their own, but if you want to visit their websites, you can when you click on the Grantsmanship Center’s map of the states.

Similar to the Grantsmanship Center, the Foundation Center has paid and free services, and the latter are quite good. You can sign up for free newsletters, including the RFP Bulletin which lists current grant announcements.

Grantstation requires a paid membership for searches, but you can sign up for a newsletter that posts current grant opportunities.

The Nonprofit Times offers a free searchable database of corporate donations.

Fundsnet gives you a searchable index by topic as well as recently announced grant opportunities.

Don Griesmann on Charity Channel provides lists of open grant opportunities. You have to join, but it’s free. Here is a sample grant list.

The internet offers grant resources that have been collected by type of grant sought.

The School Grants website has a list of government and foundation funders of educational projects along with other grantwriting resources.

Another place where grants for education are posted is Grants Alert. You can sign up to receive updates by email.

The organization Connect for Kids lists grants for organizations serving children.

The Community of Science website says it will “search the world’s most comprehensive funding resource, with more than 25,000 records representing nearly 400,000 opportunities, worth over $33 billion.”

The University of North Carolina provides grant leads for researchers.

In many cases, you may have to further filter or elaborate upon the information you receive through these collections of grant sources. Grantseeking is labor-intensive, but the payoff can be great. Good luck.

18 great sites to find government grants

Government grant opportunities are easy to find since every agency lists its open grant competitions on its website.

Grants from all agencies can be found at Grants.gov, now the federal government’s official grants portal.

The Catalog of Federal Domestic Assistance also lists all federal grants. It can be found here.

Both of these online directories feature a search for grants by topic.

Federal agencies’ grant pages show open grant competitions and provide additional resources for the grantwriter. Click on any of the following to go to the grant site:

Department of Education

Department of Health and Human Services

Department of Labor

Department of Homeland Security

Department of Housing and Urban Development

Department of Justice

Department of Environmental Protection

Department of Agriculture and Rural Development

Smaller and Quasi-governmental Agencies

Office of Faith-based and Community Initiatives

Corporation for National and Community Service

National Endowment for the Arts

National Endowment for the Humanities

National Science Foundation

Historic Preservation Fund

Library of Congress Foundation

Fish and Wildlife Service

National Wildlife Foundation

We decided whenever we talk about locating grants and resources for writing grant proposals, we will include the Grant Institute Resources page. This site has a wealth of information.

In future postings, we’ll provide information about finding private foundation and state grants.

Now, that’s an embarrassing typo: AP Stylebook edition


If you’re ever uncertain about how to spell a word, it’s always worth the time to look it up. As we mentioned in this earlier post, it takes only seconds to look up a word on an online dictionary.

By the same token, if you write quite a bit, it’s definitely worth the $15 to get online access to the AP Stylebook, the best go-to guide for proper usage. It’s a phenomenal resource you can check out here.

However, a visit to the site’s Frequently Asked Questions page reminds you that anyone can make a mistake. The FAQ’s second item reads:

Is the 2008 Associated Press Stylebook available? No, it has sold out and is not going to be reprint. The ISBN number is 978-0-917360-52-7

The obvious goof here is that “reprint” should be “reprinted.” But if we’re going to be picky (and you just know we are), the answer also is missing a period at the end.

And that’s not simply a “style” consideration, ironic as that would be. All of the other answers in the FAQ (including another that ends in a series of numbers) end with a period.

Again, we strongly recommend a subscription to the AP Stylebook to anyone who writes professionally on a regular basis (rest assured, we don’t receive a commission or anything else from the Associated Press).

But we have given the AP a heads-up about the FAQ goof, and we’re curious to see how quickly it gets fixed.

Can you find all 14 writing mistakes?

Here are some basic mistakes that do not get flagged by a spell checker. Can you spot all the errors?

I consider people talking loudly on there cell phones in public to be offense of. They should of taken care of business at home or at there work sight. Do they have more rite to be herd in public then others?

I mite just go up to a loud cell talker and say, “Are thoughts could be as important as yours. We cant here them because your so loud. You deserve an Olympic mettle for rudeness!”

There are 14 words used mistakenly in context. Did you find this type of writing to be a turnoff? One friend told us, “When I read something like this, I die a little inside.”

As we’ve said before: you must review and edit everything you write.

Don’t count on political intervention to get a government grant

I have never been around a grant where a politician has influenced which applicant gets funded. These days, government grant administrators have become insulated from political intervention. They use outside experts — variously called reviewers, readers or evaluators — to read and score proposals, removing themselves from the ultimate decision.

Grant administrators include the maximum points allotted for each section in their Requests for Proposals (RFPs). Under open government provisions, all applicants can request section scores and comments provided by reviewers. Several grantors routinely supply scores and reviewer comments anyway.

When I ran state grant programs, no politician ever pressured me to fund a competing applicant. That said, I was questioned a couple of times, after-the-fact, why an applicant was not funded. It was comforting to show the ranking of scores and the cut point where we ran out of grant funds to award.

(more…)


site by: deft interactive